Israel Political Brief April 4, 2013: PM Benjamin Netanyahu Meets Norwegian FM: We Can’t Let Iran Develop Nukes

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Netanyahu Meets Norwegian FM: We Can’t Let Iran Develop Nukes

Source: Arutz Sheva, 4-4-13

Netanyahu said during the meeting, “This model of a country talking, but at the same time developing nuclear weapons; threatening and at the same time developing nuclear weapons and threatening the use of nuclear weapons, we cannot allow this….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief March 8, 2013: French President Francois Hollande hosts President Shimon Peres, vows world will act to stop Iran nuke

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Hollande hosts Peres, vows world will act to stop Iran nuke

Source: Jerusalem Post, 3-8-13

French President Francois Hollande hosted President Shimon Peres in Paris on Friday, stating that the international community, and not Israel, would take responsibility for preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief March 3, 2013: PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s Remarks at the Start of the Cabinet Meeting on Iran & Nuclear Weapons

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

PM Netanyahu’s Remarks at the Start of the Cabinet Meeting

Source: PMO, 3-3-13

יום ראשון כ”א אדר תשע”ג

Photo by GPO

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, today, made the following remarks at the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting:

“Good morning.

I was briefed over the weekend on the major powers’ talks with Iran on the nuclear issue. The American representative briefed National Security Adviser Yaakov Amidror on these talks. My impression from these talks is that the only thing that was achieved was to stall for time during which Iran intends to continue enriching nuclear material for an atomic bomb, and it is indeed continuing toward this goal.

I must say that at this time our enemies are uniting in order to bring about not only atomic weapons that could be used against us, but other deadly weapons that are piling up around us. At a time when they are coming together and uniting their efforts, we must come together and unite our forces in order to repel these dangers.

I regret that this is not happening. I will continue my efforts in the coming days to try and unite our forces and bring them together ahead of the major national and international tasks that we face. I hope that I will succeed, I will continue to try.”

Israel Political Brief February 2, 2013: Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak says Syria strike proof that Israel ‘means it’

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Barak says Syria strike proof that Israel ‘means it’

Source: JTA, 2-3-13

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said the strike on a military site in Syria is “proof that when we say something, we mean it.”…READ MORE

Israel Political Brief January 31, 2013: Israel notified US about attack on Syria

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Report: Israel notified U.S. about attack on Syria

Source: JTA, 1-31-13

Israel gave Washington advanced notice about its attack Wednesday on a Syrian target, U.S. officials told The New York Times….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief January 25, 2013: Ehud Barak: US Could Strike Iran

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Barak: U.S. Could Strike Iran

If sanctions fail to halt Tehran’s nuclear weapons development, the Pentagon has plans for a ‘surgical operation’ to end the threat, the Israeli defense minister told The Daily Beast in a wide-ranging interview at Davos….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief September 16, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu on US news shows calls for red line on Iran

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Netanyahu on U.S. news shows calls for red line on Iran

Source: JTA, 9-16-12

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took to American news shows to push for red lines on Iran’s nuclear program….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief September 16, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu: Iran six to seven months from nuclear bomb capability

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Netanyahu: Iran six to seven months from nuclear bomb capability

The Israeli premier calls the US to spell out limits that Tehran must not cross or else face military action – something Obama has refused to do….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief September 14, 2012: Mitt Romney: Same ‘red line’ as President Barack Obama on Iran, but a different strategy

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Romney: Same ‘red line’ as Obama on Iran, but a different strategy

Source: JTA, 9-14-12

Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney suggested that he had the same “red line” as President Obama on Iran but a different strategy to prevent the Islamic Republic from crossing it….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief September 14, 2012: US official: President Barack Obama did not agree to PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s red lines

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

U.S. official: Obama did not agree to Netanyahu’s red lines

Source: JTA, 9-14-12

In their recent phone call U.S. President Barack Obama did not agree to automatic triggers for military action against Iran proposed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to an unnamed senior administration official quoted by The New York Times….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief September 14, 2012: Former officials: Israeli or U.S. strike would only delay Iran’s nuclear plans, could backfire

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Former officials: Israeli or U.S. strike would only delay Iran’s nuclear plans, could backfire

Source: JTA, 9-14-12

A group of former U.S. security officials said an Israeli or U.S. attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities may delay Iran’s nuclear program by two to four years….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief September 11, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu Stands Up to Obama, Demands Red Lines for Iran

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Netanyahu Stands Up to Obama, Demands Red Lines

Source: Israel National News, 9-11-12

“The world does not put red lines before Iran and therefore has no moral right to put red lines before Israel,” Netanyahu declares.
Netanyahu -Iran

Netanyahu -Iran
Israel news photo: Flash 90

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu issued a direct challenge to the world, and implicitly to none less than President Barack Obama, not to demand from Israel to ignore the existential threat to its existence at the hands of an Iranian nuclear weapon.

Speaking at a press conference with visiting Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borisov, Prime Minister Netanyahu said, “Those in the international community who refuse to place red lines before Iran have no moral right to place a red line before Israel.”

He directly challenged Obama administration claims that economic sanctions are a sufficient deterrent for the time being.

“We can say for sure that diplomacy and sanctions have not worked. They have damaged the economy of Iran but have not stopped the Iranian nuclear program.

“If Iran knows that there are no red lines or deadlines, what will it do? Exactly what it does today – continuing to work to acquire a nuclear weapon without and interference.”

“The world tells Israel to wait because there is time, and I ask, ‘Wait for what?’”…READ MORE

Israel Political Brief September 11, 2012: ‘Red Lines for Iran Can Prevent War,’ Says PM Benjamin Netanyahu in CBC Interview

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

‘Red Lines for Iran Can Prevent War,’ Says Netanyahu

Source: Israel National News, 9-10-12

The sooner the West draws a red line for Iran, “the greater the chances that we won’t need other types of action,” says Netanyahu.

 

Clinton and Netanyahu differ on deadlines and red lines

Clinton and Netanyahu differ on deadlines and red lines
Israel newsphoto: Flash 90

The sooner the West draws a red line that Iran will not be allowed to cross, “The greater the chances that we won’t need other types of action,” Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) Sunday night.

“Iran will not stop unless it sees clear determination by the democratic countries of the world and a clear red line,” Netanyahu said. “I don’t think that they see a clear red line.”

The Prime Minister has been harping away at the subject of Iran the past month in an effort to pressure the Obama administration to take a more aggressive stand against Iran instead of relying on negotiations and sanctions….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief August 17, 2012: Shimon Peres: Israel cannot strike Iran on its own

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Peres: Israel cannot strike Iran on its own

Source: JTA, 8-17-12

Israeli President Shimon Peres has said that Israel cannot attack Iran on its own….READ MORE

Full Text Israel Political Brief August 1, 2012: Statements by Prime Minister Netanyahu and US Secretary of Defense Panetta

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Statements by Prime Minister Netanyahu and US Secretary of Defense Panetta

Source: PMO, 8-1-12

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:  Secretary Panetta, Leon, it’s good to welcome you again to Jerusalem,   First I want to use this opportunity to thank you, President Obama and the American Congress for enhancing the strategic relationship between our two countries.

At this time of great instability in our region, the strong bi-partisan message of support for Israel is deeply appreciated.  Today we’ll have the opportunity to discuss the many challenges facing our region and no challenge is greater than stopping Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability.  Iran is the foremost sponsor of terrorism, and everything must be done to keep Iran, the world’s most dangerous regime, from developing the world’s most dangerous weapons.  You recently said that sanctions on Iran are having a big impact on the Iranian economy and that is correct.  And I’m sure that the recent sanctions advanced by the President and the Congress will have an even greater impact on Iran’s economy.

But unfortunately, it’s also true that neither sanctions nor diplomacy have yet had any impact on Iran’s nuclear weapons program.  America and Israel have also made clear that all options are on the table.  You yourself said a few months ago that when all else fails, America will act.  But these declarations have also not yet convinced the Iranians to stop their program.  However forceful our statements, they have not convinced Iran that we are serious about stopping them.  Right now the Iranian regime believes that the international community does not have the will to stop its nuclear program.  This must change and it must change quickly, because time to resolve this issue peacefully is running out.

So I look forward to speaking to you about this challenge and about the many other challenges facing our region during this turbulent time.  God knows that there are so many of them and each day just adds new ones, but I can think of no one better to discuss all this than you, Leon, so I welcome you again to Jerusalem.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta:   Thank you very much Mr. Prime Minister.  Thank you for hosting me in Jerusalem again.  It is a pleasure and I mean that sincerely, it is a pleasure to meet again for the third time and to have this opportunity to discuss the many issues that confront both Israel and the United States.  I’ve had the opportunity to do that a number of times in other capacities and now as Secretary of Defense.

Let me begin as I stated earlier today, my condolences on the attack on Israeli citizens and I want you to know that the American people deeply share your outrage on this.

Earlier today I had the opportunity, just coming from there to visit at the Iron Dome facility with Minister Barak, and I am very proud of the support that the United States has been able to provide Israel to acquire this life saving capability.  You yourself said that this is not about something to start wars with, this is designed to prevent wars and I agree with that.

I’m also proud of the defense cooperation that we’ve been able to achieve over the past few years which is really closer than at any point in our history.  My visit takes place during a time, as you pointed out, of great change and turmoil in the region. I just came from visits to Tunisia, the birthplace of the Arab Spring.  I visited Egypt, here in Israel, and then from here I will go to Jordan.

We share, Israel and the United States, shares deep concerns about the violence that’s taking place in neighboring Syria and Iran’s nuclear ambitions. And I want to reassert again the position of the United States that with regards to Iran, we will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, period.  We will not allow them to develop a nuclear weapon, and we will exert all options in the effort to ensure that that does not happen. I want you and the people of Israel to know a few things that have not and will not change.  The United States stands firmly with Israel, and we have a rock solid commitment to the security of Israel and to the security of its citizens. And make no mistake, we will remain determined to prevent Iran from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon.

I want to thank you for your friendship, for helping to advance the US-Israeli defense relationship, which is essential to the security of our nations in the 21st century.  I look forward to continue to work with you, with Minister Barak, to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge.  And to support continuing efforts to work towards a sustainable comprehensive peace and a two-state solution.

Thank you very much

Israel Political Brief August 1, 2012: Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in Israel to Talk US-Israel Defense Ties, Iran

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Panetta in Israel to talk U.S.-Israel defense ties, Iran

Source: JTA, 8-1-12

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta arrived in Israel to discuss United States-Israel defense ties and the potential threat of a nuclear-armed Iran….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief July 29, 2012: Romney in Jerusalem affirms strong Israel-U.S. alliance

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Romney in Jerusalem affirms strong Israel-U.S. alliance

Source: JTA, 7-29-12

Mitt Romney in Jerusalem affirmed the strong alliance between the United States and Israel….READ MORE

Full Text Israel Political Brief July 29, 2012: Remarks by PM Netanyahu and Former Governor Mitt Romney, Republican Nominee for President of the United States During Romney’s Visit to Israel

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Remarks by PM Netanyahu and Former Governor Mitt Romney, Republican Nominee for President of the United States

Source: PMO, 7-29-12

PM Netanyahu:  Governor Romney, Mitt, it’s a pleasure to welcome you here.  I have to say that I heard some of your remarks a few days ago – you said that the greatest danger facing the world is of the Ayatollah regime possessing nuclear weapons capability.  Mitt, I couldn’t agree with you more, and I think it’s important to do everything in our power to prevent the Ayatollahs from possessing the capability.  We have to be honest and say that all the sanctions and diplomacy so far have not set back the Iranian program by one iota.  And that’s why I believe that we need a strong and credible military threat, coupled with the sanctions, to have a chance to change that situation.

We’re going to discuss all these issues and the turbulent region that the Middle East has now become in our talks.  I want you to know that in this great convulsion, there is one stable, democratic ally of the United States here in the Middle East, and that’s Israel; and that’s why I think that strengthening the relationship between America and Israel is in the interest of peace, in the interest of both our countries, and I believe that your visit is an expression of that desire on both of our peoples.  So, I welcome you here on behalf of the State of Israel, the champion of democracy in the Middle East, as a representative of the United States, the greatest champion of freedom in the world.

Welcome to Jerusalem.

Romney:  Thank you so much.  Thank you, Mr. Prime Minister.  It’s an honor to be with you today.  We do have a friendship which spans the years, and at a critical time like this, I come to learn of your perspectives and your ideas with regards to the challenges faced in the region and challenges faced around the world.  I’m honored to be here on the day of Tisha B’Av, to recognize the solemnity of the day and also the suffering of the Jewish people over the centuries and the millennia, and come with recognition of the sacrifices of so many.  Unfortunately, the tragedies of wanton killing are not only things of the past, but have darkened our skies in even more recent times.

Your perspectives with regards to Iran and its effort to become a nuclear-capable nation are ones which I take with great seriousness and look forward to chatting with you about further actions that we can take to dissuade Iran from their nuclear folly.  Your perspectives also with regards to the developments throughout the region – in Syria, Egypt and other nations – will be most helpful.

We have a relationship between our nations which spans many years, and at the same time, is one based not just upon mutual interests, but also shared values.  Like Israel, we share a commitment to democracy, to freedom of speech, to freedom of association, to the preservation of human rights; and these common values and common principles have caused our nations to draw closer over the years.  And as we face the challenges of an Iran seeking nuclear capability, we must draw upon our interests and our values to take them on a different course and to assure that people recognize throughout the world that the United States and Israel are bound in our commitments to one another.

So thank you.  I appreciate the chance to be with you for our discussion and also a chance to enjoy a meal together, breaking the fast for your family at the end of the day, and look forward to a productive day.  Thank you.

Full Text Israel Political Brief July 29, 2012: Mitt Romney’s Speech to the Jerusalem Foundation on Israel’s Right to Defend itself From Nuclear Iran in Jerusalem, Israel

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Remarks To The Jerusalem Foundation

Source: Mitt Romney, 7-29-12

romney-2012-blog-image-israel-speech.jpg

Mitt Romney today delivered remarks to the Jerusalem Foundation in Jerusalem, Israel. The following remarks were prepared for delivery:

Thank you for that kind introduction, Mayor Barkat, and thank you all for that warm welcome.  It’s a pleasure and a privilege to be in Israel again.

To step foot into Israel is to step foot into a nation that began with an ancient promise made in this land. The Jewish people persisted through one of the most monstrous crimes in human history, and now this nation has come to take its place among the most impressive democracies on earth. Israel’s achievements are a wonder of the modern world.

These achievements are a tribute to the resilience of the Israeli people.  You have managed, against all odds, time and again throughout your history, to persevere, to rise up, and to emerge stronger.

The historian Paul Johnson, writing on the 50th anniversary of the creation of the Jewish state, said that over the course of Israel’s life, 100 completely new independent states had come into existence. “Israel is the only one whose creation can fairly be called a miracle,” Johnson wrote.

It is a deeply moving experience to be in Jerusalem, the capital of Israel.

Our two nations are separated by more than 5,000 miles. But for an American abroad, you can’t get much closer to the ideals and convictions of my own country than you do in Israel.  We’re part of the great fellowship of democracies.  We speak the same language of freedom and justice, and the right of every person to live in peace.  We serve the same cause and provoke the same hatreds in the same enemies of civilization.

It is my firm conviction that the security of Israel is in the vital national security interest of the United States. And ours is an alliance based not only on shared interests but also on enduring shared values.

In those shared values, one of the strongest voices is that of your prime minister, my friend Benjamin Netanyahu.  I met with him earlier this morning and I look forward to my family joining his this evening as they observe the close of this fast day of Tisha B’Av.

It’s remarkable to consider how much adversity, over so great a span of time, is recalled by just one day on the calendar.  This is a day of remembrance and mourning, but like other such occasions, it also calls forth clarity and resolve.

At this time, we also remember the 11 Israeli athletes and coaches who were massacred at the Munich Olympics forty years ago. Ten years ago this week, 9 Israeli and American students were murdered in the terrorist attack at Hebrew University. And tragedies like these are not reserved to the past. They are a constant reminder of the reality of hate, and the will with which it is executed upon the innocent.

It was Menachem Begin who said this about the Ninth of the month of Av:  “We remember that day,” he said, “and now have the responsibility to make sure that never again will our independence be destroyed and never again will the Jew become homeless or defenseless.” “This,” Prime Minister Begin added, “is the crux of the problems facing us in the future.”

So it is today, as Israel faces enemies who deny past crimes against the Jewish people and seek to commit new ones.

When Iran’s leaders deny the Holocaust or speak of wiping this nation off the map, only the naïve – or worse – will dismiss it as an excess of rhetoric.  Make no mistake: the ayatollahs in Tehran are testing our moral defenses.  They want to know who will object, and who will look the other way.

My message to the people of Israel and the leaders of Iran is one and the same: I will not look away; and neither will my country. As Prime Minister Begin put it, in vivid and haunting words, “if an enemy of [the Jewish] people says he seeks to destroy us, believe him.”

We have seen the horrors of history.  We will not stand by.  We will not watch them play out again.

It would be foolish not to take Iran’s leaders at their word. They are, after all, the product of a radical theocracy.

Over the years Iran has amassed a bloody and brutal record. It has seized embassies, targeted diplomats, and killed its own people. It supports the ruthless Assad regime in Syria. They have provided weapons that have killed American soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq. It has plotted to assassinate diplomats on American soil.  It is Iran that is the leading state sponsor of terrorism and the most destabilizing nation in the world.

We have a solemn duty and a moral imperative to deny Iran’s leaders the means to follow through on their malevolent intentions.

We should stand with all who would join our effort to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran – and that includes Iranian dissidents. Do not erase from your memory the scenes from three years ago, when that regime brought death to its own people as they rose up. The threat we face does not come from the Iranian people, but from the regime that oppresses them.

Five years ago, at the Herzliya Conference, I stated my view that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons capability presents an intolerable threat to Israel, to America, and to the world.

That threat has only become worse.

Now as then, the regime’s claims that it seeks to enrich nuclear material for peaceful purposes are belied by years of malign deceptions.

Now as then, the conduct of Iran’s leaders gives us no reason to trust them with nuclear material.

But today, the regime in Iran is five years closer to developing nuclear weapons capability.  Preventing that outcome must be our highest national security priority.

I want to pause on this last point. It is sometimes said that those who are the most committed to stopping the Iranian regime from securing nuclear weapons are reckless and provocative and inviting war.

The opposite is true. We are the true peacemakers. History teaches with force and clarity that when the world’s most despotic regimes secure the world’s most destructive weapons, peace often gives way to oppression, to violence, or to devastating war.

We must not delude ourselves into thinking that containment is an option. We must lead the effort to prevent Iran from building and possessing nuclear weapons capability. We should employ any and all measures to dissuade the Iranian regime from its nuclear course, and it is our fervent hope that diplomatic and economic measures will do so. In the final analysis, of course, no option should be excluded. We recognize Israel’s right to defend itself, and that it is right for America to stand with you.

These are some of the principles I first outlined five years ago. What was timely then has become urgent today.

Let me turn from Iran to other nations in the Middle East, where we have seen rising tumult and chaos. To the north, Syria is on the brink of a civil war.  The dictator in Damascus, no friend to Israel and no friend to America, slaughters his own people as he desperately clings to power.

Your other neighbor to the north, Lebanon, is under the growing and dangerous influence of Hezbollah.

After a year of upheaval and unrest, Egypt now has an Islamist President, chosen in a democratic election. Hopefully, this new government understands that one true measure of democracy is how those elected by the majority respect the rights of those in the minority.  The international community must use its considerable influence to ensure that the new government honors the peace agreement with Israel that was signed by the government of Anwar Sadat.

As you know only too well, since Hamas took control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, thousands of rockets have rained on Israeli homes and cities.  I have walked on the streets of Sderot, and honor the resolve of its people. And now, new attacks have been launched from the Sinai Peninsula.

With Hezbollah rockets aimed at Israel from the north, and Hamas rockets aimed from the south, with much of the Middle East in tumult, and with Iran bent on nuclear arms, America’s vocal and demonstrated commitment to the defense of Israel is even more critical. Whenever the security of Israel is most in doubt, America’s commitment to Israel must be most secure.

When the decision was before him in 1948, President Harry Truman decided without hesitation that the United States would be the first country to recognize the State of Israel.  From that moment to this, we have been the most natural of allies, but our alliance runs deeper than the designs of strategy or the weighing of interests.

The story of how America – a nation still so new to the world by the standards of this ancient region – rose up to become the dear friend of the people of Israel is among the finest and most hopeful in our nation’s history.

Different as our paths have been, we see the same qualities in one another. Israel and America are in many respects reflections of one another.

We both believe in democracy, in the right of every people to select their leaders and choose their nation’s course.

We both believe in the rule of law, knowing that in its absence, willful men may incline to oppress the weak.

We both believe that our rights are universal, granted not by government but by our Creator.

We both believe in free enterprise, because it is the only economic system that has lifted people from poverty, created a large and enduring middle class, and inaugurated incomparable achievements and human flourishing.

As someone who has spent most of his life in business, I am particularly impressed with Israel’s cutting edge technologies and thriving economy.  We recognize yours as the “start-up nation” – and the evidence is all around us.

You have embraced economic liberty.  You export technology, not tyranny or terrorism.  And today, your innovators and entrepreneurs have made the desert bloom and have made for a better world.  The citizens of our countries are fortunate to share in the rewards of economic freedom and in the creativity of our entrepreneurs. What you have built here, with your own hands, is a tribute to your people, and a model for others.

Finally, we both believe in freedom of expression, because we are confident in our ideas and in the ability of men and women to think for themselves.  We do not fear open debate. If you want to hear some very sharp criticisms of Israel and its policies, you don’t have to cross any borders.  All you have to do is walk down the street and into a café, where you’ll hear people reasoning, arguing, and speaking their mind. Or pick up an Israeli newspaper – you’ll find some of the toughest criticism of Israel you’ll read anywhere. Your nation, like ours, is stronger for this energetic exchange of ideas and opinions.

That is the way it is in a free society. There are many millions of people in the Middle East who would cherish the opportunity to do the same.  These decent men and women desire nothing more than to live in peace and freedom and to have the opportunity to not only choose their government but to criticize it openly, without fear of repression or repercussion.

I believe that those who oppose these fundamental rights are on the wrong side of history. But history’s march can be ponderous and painfully slow. We have a duty to speed and shape history by being unapologetic ambassadors for the values we share.

The United States and Israel have shown that we can build strong economies and strong militaries. But we must also build strong arguments that advance our values and promote peace. We must work together to change hearts and awaken minds through the power of freedom, free enterprise and human rights.

I believe that the enduring alliance between the State of Israel and the United States of America is more than a strategic alliance: it is a force for good in the world. America’s support of Israel should make every American proud. We should not allow the inevitable complexities of modern geopolitics to obscure fundamental touchstones. No country or organization or individual should ever doubt this basic truth:  A free and strong America will always stand with a free and strong Israel.

And standing by Israel does not mean with military and intelligence cooperation alone.

We cannot stand silent as those who seek to undermine Israel, voice their criticisms.  And we certainly should not join in that criticism. Diplomatic distance in public between our nations emboldens Israel’s adversaries.

By history and by conviction, our two countries are bound together.  No individual, no nation, no world organization, will pry us apart. And as long as we stay together and stand together, there is no threat we cannot overcome and very little that we cannot achieve.

Thank you all.  May God bless America, and may He bless and protect the Nation of Israel.

Israel Political Brief July 26, 2012: Ehud Barak: Preemptive Strike Would be Less Costly Than Nuclear Iran

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Barak: Strike would be less costly than nuclear Iran

Source: JTA, 7-26-12

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said that a preemptive military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities would be less costly for Israel than Iran’s possession of a nuclear weapon….READ MORE

Israel Political Brief July 26, 2012: Defense Minister Ehud Barak: We’ll Have to Make Decisions on Nuclear Iran

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Barak: We’ll Have to Make Decisions on Iran

Defense Minister Ehud Barak: Nuclear Iran would lead to a nuclear arms race throughout the Middle East.

Source: Israel National News, 7-26-12

Ehud Barak
Ehud Barak
Flash 90

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Wednesday that Israel will soon need to reach decisions regarding Iran.

Speaking during a graduation ceremony at the National Security College, Barak said, “The State of Israel is facing some of the most complex challenges which its security and political leadership has ever had to face.

“We may be required to make difficult decisions concerning the national security of Israel and ensuring its future,” he said. “The whole region around us has been turbulent and noisy for almost two years, instability is increasing and security challenges grew each day. The events of the Arab Spring which gradually became an Islamic Summer teach us that in the ultimate test we can rely only on ourselves.

“I am well aware of and know the difficulties and complexities involved in thwarting Iran’s achievement of nuclear weapons,” said Barak. “However, I know beyond a doubt that dealing with the challenge itself would be infinitely more complex, infinitely more dangerous and far more expensive in terms of both human lives as well as resources.”

Barak stressed that “A nuclear Iran is a threat to international order. It will lead to an arms race throughout the Middle East.”

Regarding Syria, the defense minister said, “We are closely following the developments in Syria. We said and we mean it that the State of Israel cannot accept the transfer of advanced weapons systems from Syria to Hizbullah. A massacre and murder of citizens by government forces is going on Syria as the entire world watches.

“Bashar Assad has lost his legitimacy to rule. It seems that every day that passes brings the end of the current regime closer. The difficulty of the international community in formulating a response to present bloodshed and death of innocents can be a lesson for us and illustrate the limitations of the ability of the international community to mobilize political will, unity of purpose and ability to function even when the situation requires it.”…READ MORE

Israel Political Brief May 24, 2012: Iran nuclear talks end without clear progress

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Iran nuke talks end without clear progress

Source: JTA, 5-24-12

Talks between world powers and Iran on its nuclear program ended with Iran reportedly reluctant to advance without sanctions concessions.

The talks conducted on Wednesday and Thursday in Baghdad between Iran and Russia, the United States, China, Britain France and Germany ended inconclusively, multiple media reports said, because Iran wanted a hold on major European oil sanctions set to kick in July 1 in exchange for staying at the table.

 

Western powers have emphasized that sanctions would remain in place until Iran provably made its program more transparent and suspended some enrichment of uranium — a key demand of Israel, which has expressed concern that Iran is buying time with the talks.

 

The next round of talks will be held in Moscow, June 17-19.

 

Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Western experts say evidence increasingly suggests that Iran is close to a capability to build a nuclear weapon.

Full Text Israel Political Brief May 18, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s Comments Baghdad Talks on Iran’s Nuclear Weapons Program

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

PM Netanyahu Comments on Baghdad Talks

Source: PMO, 5-18-12

Photo by GPO

Following are remarks that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made about the Baghdad talks, earlier today, at a press availability in Prague:

“Obviously, nothing would be better than to see this issue resolved diplomatically.  But I have seen no evidence that Iran is serious about stopping its nuclear weapons program.  It looks as though they see these talks as another opportunity to deceive and delay just like North Korea did for years.

They may try to go from meeting to meeting with empty promises.  They may agree to something in principle but not implement it.  They might even agree to implement something that does not materially derail their nuclear weapons program.

Iran is good at playing this chess game.  They know that sometimes you have to sacrifice a pawn to save the king.  The goal of these negotiations should be very clear:

Freeze all enrichment inside Iran.

Remove all enriched material outside of Iran.

And dismantle Qom.

When this goal is achieved, I will be the first to applaud.  Until then, count me among the skeptics.”

Israel Political Brief May 16, 2012: Amid new Iran nuclear rumors, Ehud Barak and Leon Panetta to meet

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Amid new Iran nuke rumors, Barak and Panetta to meet

Source: JTA, 5-16-12

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak will meet with his U.S. counterpart, Leon Panetta, in Washington amid reports that Iran may have achieved the capability to build a nuclear bomb.

Israel has said that such a capability is a “red line” that could trigger military action.

The defense chiefs are scheduled to meet Thursday.

The Associated Press reported this week that it had obtained a drawing of an explosives containment chamber said to exist on an Iranian military site. The chamber’s only known use would be to test nuclear weapons.

Iran has denied reports that it is seeking a nuclear weapon. Western experts have said the Islamic Republic appears to be moving closer to such a capability.

The Obama administration has endeavored to keep Israel from striking while it pursues sanctions and diplomatic pressure as a means of getting Iran to retreat from its suspected nuclear weapons program.

Israel Political Brief April 16, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu: Talks with Iran Have Given it a ‘Freebie’

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Netanyahu: Talks with Iran Have Given it a ‘Freebie’

PM Netanyahu meets U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman, warns against Iran using talks to further advance its nuclear program.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu addressed on Sunday the latest round of talks between Iran and six world powers, which were held in Turkey over the weekend.

Netanyahu, who met with U.S. Senator (ID-CT) Joe Lieberman, warned against Iran using the opportunity to advance its nuclear weapons program.

On Saturday, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, said the talks have been constructive and that the sides will meet again in Baghdad on May 23.

Ashton said future talks will be guided by the “principle of a step-by-step approach and reciprocity.”

“My initial impression is that Iran has been given a freebie,” Netanyahu said during his meeting with Lieberman. “It’s got five weeks to continue enrichment without any limitation.”

He added, “I think Iran should take immediate steps. First, stop all enrichment, take out all the enriched material and dismantle the nuclear facility in Qom. I believe that the world’s greatest practitioner of terrorism must not have the opportunity to develop atomic bombs.”

Last week, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said it was now “urgent” for Iran to ease concerns over its nuclear program.

“We believe there is still time for diplomacy, but it is urgent that the Iranians come to the table to establish an environment conducive to achieving concrete results through a sustained process,” Clinton said.

Israel Political Brief March 16, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu Makes the Case for Going It Alone Against Iran

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Netanyahu Makes the Case for Going It Alone Against Iran

By his own account, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went to Washington this month with two goals.

Source: Time, 3-15-12

Lior Mizrahi / Getty Images

Lior Mizrahi / Getty Images
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a director-generals conference March 13, 2012 in Jerusalem, Israel.

By his own account, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went to Washington this month with two goals. One was to continue his 15-year campaign to push Iran’s nuclear program to the top of the world’s agenda. That mission was accomplished, Netanyahu declared to the Knesset on Wednesday. The other aim was to hear Washington acknowledge that Israel has the right to launch a military operation on its own against Iran if it sees fit. “This position was positively received in the United States, I would even say in the most profound way,” he said.

With that, the Israeli Premier launched an extended argument for defying American requests for restraint and going ahead with a strike on Iran. He cited as precedent the bold calls of three of his predecessors: David Ben-Gurion’s decision to announce independence in 1948 despite the U.S. Secretary of State’s advice to wait; Levi Eshkol’s decision to launch the 1967 Six-Day War despite President Lyndon Johnson’s warning; and Menachem Begin’s 1981 decision to strike Saddam Hussein’s nuclear reactor at Osirak (though Ronald Reagan appeared mostly amused when he heard about that strike, famously remarking, “Boys will be boys!”).

(MORE: Diplomacy With Iran: Hey, What’s the Hurry?)

“I presented the example I just gave you to my hosts in Washington,” Netanyahu reported, “and I believe that the first goal I set — to strengthen the recognition of Israel’s right to defend itself — I think that goal was achieved.”

Never mind that, by the end of the speech, Netanyahu sounded as though the target of an Israeli attack would be the Gaza Strip, the Palestinian enclave from which militants launched more than 200 missiles over the previous week, many of them supplied by Iran. “Gaza equals Iran,” he said, concluding the speech with the warning: “Sooner or later, Iran’s terror base in Gaza will be uprooted.” Analysts came away from the session convinced that the first target remains Tehran and debated whether he was indeed serious about going it alone or merely giving the appearance in order to keep international pressure on Iran….READ MORE

Full Text Israel Political Brief March 14, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s Speech at the Knesset 40 Signatures Special Session — Israel can attack Iran alone without US permission — Transcript

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Lior Mizrahi / Getty Images

Lior Mizrahi / Getty Images
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a director-generals conference March 13, 2012 in Jerusalem, Israel.

PM Netanyahu’s Speech at the Knesset 40 Signatures Special Session

Source: PMO, 3-14-12

Mr. Speaker, I have been sitting here for hours, listening and enjoying myself.  It is just like the reception at Aipac.  MK Wilf was there, as well as MK Dalia Itzik and Minister Yossi Peled.  I missed this place, the praise, the compliments, the manners, and above all, Israeli understatement.  In short, I missed you.

I am not being sarcastic when I say this.  I appreciate the purpose for this meeting, hearing specific problems which allows me, at the very least, to try to address various problems bothering us in a practical manner.  However, before I begin, I would like to thank the residents in the South and the heads of local authorities there, the IDF commanders and soldiers and the Israel Security Agency.

It is said that the job of Prime Minister of Israel is one of the most complex ones in the world.  I can tell you from experience: there is truth to this statement, but even during difficult hours, there are moments that give one small comfort and warm the heart.  This was the case this week when I met with the Iron Dome soldiers, men and women who are protecting all our homes.

By the way, in the age of missiles this statement is very accurate.  They are protecting our homes.  There were soldiers there who were from the area, from Ashdod, but also from the Galilee.  They are protecting all our homes.  I felt the same way when I met with the residents of the South and their heads of the local authorities.  They are an important component in our national resilience.  Therefore, I am certain that I speak for all the members of Knesset when I say that I salute them all.  They certainly deserve it.

I would like to clarify that there is no such thing as hermetic defense and there never will be.  The combination of offensive readiness, defensive readiness and national resilience is a winning combination and we must nurture it.

I would like to say something to my colleagues, the Ministers and members of Knesset.  During my recent visit to Washington, I set two goals: the first goal was to clarify that Israel has the right to defend itself by itself against any danger.  The second goal was to raise the threat of Iran’s nuclear armament to the top of the international community’s list of priorities.

With regard to the first goal, the recognition of

Israel’s right to defend itself – there are those for whom this right seems self-evident.  However, we had a previous Prime Minister, important and wise – Menachem Begin – who said that sometimes it is important to restate that which is self-evident.  So I decided to do that, forcefully.  Israel has the right to defend itself and, if necessary, to realize that right.  This position was positively received in the United States, I would even say in the most profound way.

This position has earned absolute support from the American people.  It has earned resounding approval in the Congress.  I heard it from the Senate, the House of Representatives, the Democratic leadership, the Republican leadership – from everyone.  And it has also earned official recognition from the White House.

President Obama told me very explicitly during my visit, and I quote, “Israel must have the ability to defend itself, by itself, against any threat”.  He also added, “Israel has the sovereign right to make its own decisions with regard to its security”.

I appreciate the President’s statements, and I appreciate the deep and staunch alliance we have with the United States of America.  As I said in Washington, in light of what is occurring in our region, in the Middle East and even beyond, this alliance between Israel and the US is prominent.  However, there is something even more prominent and that is our right, our duty, to be the masters of our own fate.

Israel has never left its fate in the hands of others, not even in the hands of our best friends.  This is the supreme duty I am charged with as Prime Minister of Israel.  It is the supreme duty all Prime Ministers of Israel are charged with.  It was this duty that David Ben-Gurion upheld when he declared the establishment of the country in 1948.

The American then-Secretary of State, the legendary George Marshall – and I say legendary because he was a World War Two hero – asked Ben-Gurion to wait.  He said that there was time.  However, Ben-Gurion did not wait, he decided to declare the establishment of the country.  Prime Minister Levy Eshkol also upheld this duty during the waiting period in 1967, when the stranglehold around Israel grew tighter.  On the eve of the Six Day War, he sent Abba Even to the White House to ask the United States to fulfill the written commitment they gave Israel when it withdrew from the Sinai in 1956 and open the Straits of Tiran.  President Johnson asked Abba Even to wait.  He was told that it was not the time.  More than that, they told him, “If you act alone – you will stay alone”.  However, Eshkol upheld his duty and he acted.

Finally, in 1981, that same duty guided Menachem Begin as he faced the question of the Iraqi nuclear reactor.  He was well aware of the international criticism that would come, including, by the way, from our friend, the United States and President Reagan.  He knew there would be such criticism if we acted to destroy the Iraqi reactor.  However, he did his duty and acted.  Let me tell you, my friends, with time it became clear that our relations with the United States not only were not harmed, they grew even stronger.

We would prefer that Iran abandon its nuclear program peacefully.  Everyone prefers this, and of course, so do I.  However, the duty I am charged with is to defend Israel’s independent ability to defend itself against any challenge.

I presented the example I just gave you to my hosts in Washington, and I believe that the first goal I set, to strengthen the recognition of Israel’s right to defend itself – I think that goal was achieved.

The second goal of my visit, to raise Iran’s nuclear armament to the top of the international community’s list of priorities – I believe that goal was also achieved.  I would like to clarify to you that this is not the result of one visit.  I have been acting to this end, together with my colleagues here, methodically for over 15 years.  I have always believed that an Iran armed with nuclear weapons would pose an existential threat to Israel and a serious threat to the well-being and security of the entire world.  I warned against this threat even when it was not popular to do so, and even when it was unacceptable – when many leaders in Israel and around the world preferred to ignore Iran’s nuclear program and its repercussions.

There were those who believed, and probably still believe, that an agreement with the Palestinians is the solution, that it would lead to a solution of the Iranian problem.  As if an agreement with Mahmoud Abbas would stop the centrifuges.  Let’s make a deal and the centrifuges will stop spinning.  Whoever wants to believe this can do so, but he is simply burying his head in the sand.

There are many reasons to come to an agreement with the Palestinians: because we want peace; because we want calm; because I do not want a binational state.  However, thinking that an agreement with Abbas will stop Iran and its satellite states – this is a dangerous illusion.  I must admit that some people excel at illusions.

I had just returned from Washington, and I heard several members of Knesset and others say, “It is very good that you raised the issue of a nuclear Iran to the top of the international community’s list of priorities.  But look – it is the Palestinian issue that is exploding in our faces”.

Understand, the dominant factor that motivates these events in Gaza is not the Palestinian issue.  The dominant factor that motivates these events in Gaza is Iran.

Gaza equals Iran.

Where do the missiles come from?  From Iran.

Where does the money come from?  From Iran.

Who trains the terrorists?  Iran.

Who builds the infrastructure?  Iran.

I have said this many times: who gives the orders?  Iran.

Gaza is a forward operating base for Iran.

I heard some people say that a third- or fourth-rate terrorist organization is acting against a million citizens in the State of Israel.  That is not true.  Iran is operating against us.

I hope that if not all, at least most members here and the public understand that the terrorist organizations in Gaza – Hamas and Jihad, as well as Hezbollah in Lebanon – are taking shelter under an Iranian umbrella.

Now imagine what will happen if that umbrella becomes nuclear.  Imagine that behind these terrorist organizations stands a country that calls for our destruction and it is armed with nuclear weapons.

Are you ready for this?  I am not ready for this!  And any responsible leader understands that we cannot let this happen – because of nuclear terror and the nuclear threat, but also because of the strengthening of conventional terror and the firing of missiles at us.

A Prime Minister of Israel cannot entrust the ability to act against this threat to others.

I know there are people who claim that I am terrifying people.  I heard those same people say exactly the same thing when my colleagues and I warned them against the Disengagement, when we said that Gaza would become an enormous terrorist base – they said I was terrifying people then as well.  I resigned from the government because I was not prepared to be a part of that Disengagement.  When I said they would fire missiles from Gaza on Ashkelon, Beer-Sheva and Ashdod, they said we were sowing panic.  They said a unilateral withdrawal would lead to a breakthrough in peace.  Well, where is that breakthrough?  What peace?

We dragged the entire country into the mud, and we are dealing with a situation that was created as a result of the Disengagement.  We, unlike other people, are dealing responsibly and with discretion with this problem, and we will eventually resolve it, just as we are resolving the other problems we inherited.  We will resolve them too.

They brought Iran into Gaza – we will remove Iran from Gaza.  We did not bring Iran into Gaza – you brought Iran into Gaza!

Wherever we withdrew, Iran entered.  We withdrew from Lebanon, Iran came in.  We withdrew from Gaza, Iran came in.  Some people suggest that we act in a similar manner in Judea and Samaria.  Iran will come in there too.  I cannot believe that there is anyone, despite your yelling, despite your objections and opposition, who does not understand that we cannot repeat this same mistake a third time.

I believe that perhaps all of you, with certain isolated exceptions, understand that we cannot repeat this mistake.  If we come to an agreement with the Palestinians, we must ensure that our security foundations are sound and that Iran cannot enter the territory.  We also know that when we warned that this would happen in Gaza and that a unilateral withdrawal would lead to this exact result, some people ignored those warnings, and today we know the results.  We also know that we cannot agree to this for long.

Our enemies must know that, at the end of the day, Israel will not accept an Iranian base in Gaza.  Sooner or later, Iran’s terror base in Gaza will be uprooted.

דברי ראש הממשלה נתניהו בדיון 40 חתימות בכנסת

יום רביעי כ’ אדר תשע”ב

אדוני היו”ר, אני יושב פה כמה שעות, מקשיב, נהנה. זה ממש כמו קבלת פנים באיפא”ק. הייתה שם חברת הכנסת וילף, חברת הכנסת דליה איציק והשר יוסי פלד. אני התגעגעתי, לשבחים, למחמאות, לנימוס, מעל לכל לאנדרסטייטמנט הישראלי, בקיצור, התגעגעתי אליכם.

אני לא אומר את זה בלשון סגי נהור, אני מעריך את הישיבה הזאת, לשמוע בעיות פרטניות שמאפשרות לי לפחות לנסות להתייחס באופן מעשי לבעיות שונות שמטרידות אותנו. אבל כמובן שבפתח דבריי, אני מבקש להודות לתושבי הדרום, לראשי הרשויות שם, למפקדי וחיילי צה”ל, והשב”כ.

אומרים שראש ממשלת ישראל, זה אחד התפקידים המורכבים ביותר שישנם. ואני יכול להגיד לכם מניסיון, יש בזה משהו, אבל גם בשעות המורכבות, ישנם רגעים שנותנים קצת נחת ומחממים את הלב. וכך היה השבוע כשנפגשתי,עם לוחמות ולוחמי כיפת ברזל, חיילים וחיילות ששומרים על הבית של כולנו.

אגב, בעידן הטילים זו אמירה מאוד מדוייקת. הם שומרים על הבית. היו שם חיילים וחיילות מהמקום, מאשדוד אבל גם מהגליל. הם שומרים על הבית של כולנו. וכך היה כשפגשתי את תושבי הדרום, את ראשי הרשויות שלהם, זה חלק חשוב מאוד מהחוסן הלאומי שלנו. לכן אני בטוח שאני מדבר בשם כולכם, חברי הכנסת כשאני אומר שאני מצדיע לכולם. הם בהחלט ראויים לזה.  אני רוצה להבהיר שאין הגנה הרמטית, גם לא תהיה. השילוב של כושר התקפה, כושר הגנה וחוסן לאומי זה השילוב המנצח אותו אנחנו צריכים לטפח.

אני מבקש לומר לכם ידידיי השרים, וידידיי חברי כנסת, שבביקורי האחרון בוושינגטון, הצבתי שני יעדים: היעד הראשון הוא להבהיר שלישראל הזכות להגן על עצמה, בכוחות עצמה, מול כל איום. היעד השני היה להעלות את איום התחמשותה הגרעינית של איראן לראש סדר היום הבינלאומי.

לגבי היעד הראשון, ההכרה בזכותה של ישראל להגן על עצמה – יש כאלה, שעבורם הזכות הזאת נראית מובנת מאליה. אבל היה כבר ראש ממשלה, חשוב וחכם, מנחם בגין שאמר שלפעמים חשוב לחזור ולומר את המובן מאליו. וכך החלטתי לעשות ובעוצמה. זכותה של ישראל להגן על עצמה, ובמקרה הצורך -  לממש זכות זו. עמדה זו התקבלה בארה”ב באופן חיובי, הייתי אומר באופן עמוק ביותר.

עמדה זו זוכה לגיבוי מוחלט מהעם האמריקני. היא זוכה להסְּכָּמָה מקיר לקיר בקונגרס האמריקני,שמעתי את זה עכשיו בסנאט, בבית הנבחרים, מההנהגה הדמוקרטית, מההנהגה הרפובליקנית, מכולם. והיא גם זוכה להכרה רשמית בבית הלבן.

הנשיא אובמה אמר במהלך הביקור בצורה מפורשת, אני מצטט: “לישראל חייבת להיות היכולת להגן על עצמה, בכוחות עצמה, מול כל איום”. הוא גם הוסיף: “ולישראל יש את הזכות הריבונית לקבל החלטות בכל הנוגע לביטחונה”.

אני מעריך את הדברים האלה של נשיא ארה”ב, אני מעריך את הברית העמוקה והאיתנה שיש לנו עם ארצות-הברית של אמריקה. כפי שאמרתי בוושינגטון לאור כל מה שמתרחש באזורנו. במזרח התיכון, אפילו מעבר למזרח התיכון. הברית הזאת בין ישראל לארה”ב  בולטת מעל פני השטח. אבל יש משהו שבולט עוד יותר, וזו הזכות, והחובה שלנו, להיות אדונים לגורלנו.

ישראל מעולם לא הפקידה את גורלה בידי אחרים וגם לא בידי הטובים שבידידיה. זאת החובה העליונה שמוטלת עליי כראש ממשלת ישראל, זאת החובה העליונה שמוטלת על כל ראשי ממשלה בישראל. החובה הזאת עמדה לנגד עיניו של דוד בן-גוריון, כשהוא הכריז ב- 1948 על הקמת המדינה.

מזכיר המדינה האמריקני דאז, ג’ורג’ מרשל האגדי, אני אומר אגדי כי הוא היה גיבור מלחימת העולם השנייה, הוא ביקש מבן–גוריון לחכות. הוא אמר יש זמן. אבל בן-גוריון לא חיכה, הוא החליט להכריז על הקמת המדינה. החובה הזאת עמדה גם לנגד עיניו של ראש הממשלה לוי אשכול בתקופת ההמתנה ב-1967. כשטבעת החנק התהדקה סביב ישראל. ערב מלחמת ששת הימים הוא שלח את אבא אבן לבית הלבן, ביקש שארה”ב תממש את ההתחייבות הכתובה שהיא נתנה לישראל כשיצאנו ב-56′ מסיני. לפתוח את מיצרי טיראן.

הנשיא ג’ונסון ביקש מאבא אבן לחכות, אמרו לו: זה לא הזמן, יותר מזה, אמרו לו “אם תפעלו לבד – תהיו לבד”. אבל אשכול נהג לפי חובתו – והוא פעל. ובשנת 81′, אותה חובה הדריכה את מנחם בגין, כשהתמודד עם שאלת הכור הגרעיני בעיראק.

הוא היה מודע היטב לביקורת הבינלאומית שתבוא, כולל, אגב, מצד ארה”ב ידידתנו והנשיא רייגן. הוא ידע שתבוא ביקורת כזו אם נפעל להחרבת הכור בעיראק. אך הוא מילא את החובה שלו ופעל. אני אומר לכם ידידי, שעם הזמן התברר גם שהיחסים שלנו עם ארה”ב לא רק שלא נפגעו, הם הלכו והתהדקו.

אנו מעדיפים שאיראן תנטוש את תוכנית הגרעין שלה בדרכי שלום. זאת העדפה של כולנו, וכמובן גם שלי. אבל החובה שמוטלת עליי היא  לשמור על היכולת העצמית של ישראל להגן על עצמה  מול כל אתגר.

הצגתי בפני מארחי בוושינגטון את הדוגמות שכרגע ציינתי בפניכם, ואני מאמין שהיעד הראשון שהצבתי, לבצר את ההכרה בזכותה של ישראל להגן על עצמה – אני חושב שהיעד הזה הושג.

היעד השני של ביקורי, להעלות את התחמשותה של איראן בנשק גרעיני לראש סדר העדיפות  הבינלאומי – אני מאמין שיעד זה הושג גם כן. אני רוצה להבהיר לכם, זאת אינה תוצאה של ביקור אחד. אני פועל בעניין הזה יחד עם כמה מחבריי כאן בשיטתיות למעלה מ-15 שנה. מאז ומתמיד האמנתי שאיראן חמושה בנשק גרעיני תהווה איום קיומי על ישראל ואיום חמור לשלומו וביטחונו של העולם הזהרתי מפני איום זה גם כשהדבר לא היה פופולארי, ואפילו כשלא היה מקובל – כשמנהיגים רבים בארץ ובעולם העדיפו להעלים עין מתכנית הגרעין האיראנית ומהשלכותיה.

היו שסברו, וכנראה גם סוברים היום, שהסכם עם הפלסטינים זה הפתרון. זה מה שיביא לפתרון של הבעיה האיראנית. כאילו הסכם עם אבו-מאזן, יעצור את הצנטריפוגות. נעשה הסכם והצנטריפוגות יפסיקו להסתובב. מי שרוצה להאמין בזה יכול לעשות זאת אבל זה פשוט לטמון את הראש בחול.

יש הרבה סיבות לעשות הסכם עם הפלסטינים – כי אנחנו רוצים שלום, כי אנחנו רוצים רגיעה, כי אני לא רוצה ו מדינה דו-לאומית. אבל לחשוב שההסדר עם אבו-מאזן יעצור את איראן וגרורותיה – זאת אשליה מסוכנת! אני חייב שיש כאלה שמצטיינים באשליות.

רק חזרתי מוושינגטון ושמעתי כמה מחברי הכנסת ואחרים אומרים “יפה מאוד שהעלית את נושא הגרעין האיראני לראש סדר היום הבינלאומי. אבל הנה – דווקא הנושא הפלסטיני מתפוצץ לנו בפרצוף’.

תבינו, הגורם הדומיננטי שמניע את האירועים בעזה זה לא הנושא הפלסטיני. הגורם הדומיננטי שמניע את האירועים בעזה זה איראן.

עזה זה איראן.

מאין באים הטילים? מאיראן.

מאין בא הכסף? מאיראן.

מי מכשיר את הטרוריסטים? איראן.

מי בונה את התשתיות? איראן.

הרבה פעמים אני יכול להגיד לכם – מי נותן את ההוראות? איראן.

עזה היא העמדה הקדמית של איראן.

שמעתי גם כאלה שאומרים שארגון טרור סוג ג’, סוג ד’ פועל נגד מיליון אזרחים במדינת ישראל. זה לא נכון. זו איראן שפועלת.

אני מקווה שאם לא כולם אז רוב החברים כאן והציבור היום כבר מבינים שארגוני הטרור בעזה, החמאס והג’יהאד, וגם החיזבאללה בלבנון חוסים תחת מטריה איראנית.

עכשיו תארו לעצמכם מה יקרה אם המטריה הזאת תהפוך לגרעינית.

תארו לכם שמאחורי ארגוני הטרור עומדת מדינה שקוראת להשמדתנו והיא חמושה בפצצות גרעין.

אתם מוכנים לזה?

אני לא מוכן לזה!

וכל מנהיג אחראי מבין שאסור לתת לזה לקרות.

גם בגלל הטרור הגרעיני והאיום הגרעיני וגם בגלל ההתעצמות של הטרור הקונבנציונאלי וירי הטילים עלינו.

אסור לראש ממשלה בישראל להפקיד את היכולת לפעול נגד האיום הזה בידי אחרים.

אני יודע שיש אלה שטוענים שאני מהלך אימים.

שמעתי את אותם אנשים אומרים בדיוק את אותם דברים כשחבריי ואני הזהרנו אותם לפני ההתנתקות, כשאמרנו שעזה תהפוך לבסיס טרור ענק – גם אז הם אמרו שאנו מהלכי אימים. אני התפטרתי מהממשלה כי לא הייתי מוכן להיות חלק מההתנתקות הזו. כשאמרתי שיעופו טילים מעזה לאשקלון, לבאר-שבע, ואשדוד.

אמרו שאנחנו זורעים פאניקה.

אמרו שהנסיגה החד-צדדית תביא פריצת דרך לשלום.

נו, איזו פריצה? איזו דרך? איזה שלום?

הכניסו את כל המדינה לבוץ, ואנחנו מתמודדים עם המצב שנוצר בעקבות ההתנתקות. אנחנו מתמודדים, בניגוד לאחרים, באחריות, בשיקול דעת, אבל בסופו של דבר גם את הבעיה הזאת נפתור. כמו שאנחנו פותרים את הבעיות האחרות שירשנו, גם את זה נפתור.

הכניסו את איראן לעזה – אנחנו נוציא את איראן מעזה.

לא אנחנו הכנסנו את איראן לעזה – אתם הכנסתם את איראן לעזה!

כל מקום שפינינו איראן נכנסה. יצאנו מלבנון, איראן נכנסה. יצאנו מעזה, איראן נכנסה. יש שמציעים לעשות דבר דומה ביהודה ושומרון. איראן תיכנס גם לשם. אני לא מאמין שיש מישהו,  חרף הצעקות שלכם, חרף ההתנגדות שלכם וההתרסות שלכם, שלא מבין שאסור לחזור על הטעות הזאת בפעם שלישית.

אני מאמין שאולי כולם, עם יוצאים מן הכלל בודדים, מבינים שאסור לחזור על הטעות הזאת. אם נעשה הסכם עם הפלשתינים אנחנו חייבים להבטיח שיסודות הביטחון איתנים ושאיראן לא תיכנס לשטח. אנחנו יודעים גם שכשהזהרנו שהדבר הזה יקרה בעזה ושנסיגה חד צדדית תביא בדיוק  לתוצאה הזו היה מי שהתעלם מהאזהרות והיום אנחנו יודעים מה התוצאות. אנחנו גם יודעים שאנחנו לא יכולים להסכים לזה לאורך זמן.

על אויבנו לדעת שבסופו של יום ישראל לא תסבול בסיס איראני בעזה.

במוקדם או במאוחר בסיס הטרור של איראן בעזה ייעקר.

Israel Political Brief March 14, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu: Gaza violence shows Israel cannot afford to be lax on Iran nuclear threat

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Netanyahu: Gaza violence shows Israel cannot afford to be lax on Iran nuclear threat

In speech to Knesset, PM says Israel must be able to defend itself, blames Kadima’s 2005 disengagement in allowing Iranian takeover of Gaza and says Iran’s base in the Strip will be ‘uprooted sooner or later.’

Source: Haaretz, 3-14-12

Israel cannot allow terror groups to be backed by a nuclear Iran, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a speech to the Knesset on Wednesday, adding that those who say he is exaggerating the severity of the Iranian threat were those who allowed Iran’s takeover of the Gaza Strip.

Netanyahu spoke following a recently achieved truce between and Israel Defense Forces and Gaza militants which capped four days of rocket attacks on southern Israel and Israeli strikes of the Strip.

Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking to the Knesset, May 16, 2011.
Photo by: Daniel Bar-On

Referring to the recent bout of violence in his address to the Knesset, Netanyahu blamed Iran for taking over the Gaza Strip through the Hamas militant group, saying that “the dominant element driving events in Gaza is not the Palestinians but Iran, who is building the infrastructures, provides the money, and sometimes gives the orders,” and that sooner or later, the Iranian base in Gaza “will be uprooted.”

“Gaza is Iran’s forward position,” the PM added, saying that he exited Sharon’s cabinet prior to 2005 disengagement since he knew then that “rockets would fly out of Gaza, fly at Ashkelon, Be’er Sheva, at Ashdod. They said we were spreading panic, that the move would lead to a breakthrough to peace. What breakthrough? What peace?”

Netanyahu then directly accused the disengagement for allowing the Iranian takeover of the Strip, telling the Kadima MKs: “Iran was let into Gaza, but it wasn’t we that let Iran into Gaza, it was you.”

“As soon as we were out, Iran went in,” the premier added, saying the same criticism of his stance toward the disengagement in 2005 was used currently to play down the severity of the Iranian nuclear threat.

“A nuclear Iran would represent an existential threat on the State of Israel and the safety of the entire world,” the premier said.

Netanyahu then warned against the effect of a nuclear power backing terror groups such as those which have been attacking southern Israel with rockets, saying: “Imagine that behind terror groups was a country calling for our destruction and armed with nuclear bombs.”

“Are you ready for that? I’m not. Every leader knows this cannot be allowed to pass. An Israeli prime minister cannot hand over the ability to act against this threat to others,” the PM said….READ MORE

Full Text Political Brief March 7, 2012: PM Benjamin Netanyahu Fox News “On the Record with Greta Van Susteran” Interview — Iran’s nuclear weapons a ‘threat to the peace of the world that must be stopped’ — Transcript

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Featured Videos

Netanyahu: Heed the ‘jarring gong of danger’ from Iran

Source: Fox News, 3-7-12

- 16:22 -

Uncut: Israeli prime minister warns that Iran’s nuclear weapons threat must be taken seriously by the world before it’s too late

This is a rush transcript from “On the Record,” March 7, 2012. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, FOX NEWS HOST: It is no secret nations are terrified that Iran is working on a nuclear weapon. Iran has repeatedly threatened Israel, including a threat to wipe it off the map. Is Israel going to do anything about it?

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, here in Washington, meeting with President Obama, and then going “On the Record.”

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

VAN SUSTEREN: Mr. Prime Minister, nice to see you, sir.

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER: Thank you. It’s good to be with you again, Greta.

VAN SUSTEREN: And welcome back to the United States.

NETANYAHU: Thank you.

VAN SUSTEREN: We had fun talking — I enjoyed talking to you last fall when you were here.

NETANYAHU: Indeed.

VAN SUSTEREN: Last night, I listened very carefully to your speech, very carefully. And in fact, I have a transcript of it in front of me. And it says that the international community’s tried diplomacy, that hasn’t worked, that the community has applied sanctions, that hasn’t worked, either, that there are efforts to impose tougher sanctions, but Iran’s nuclear program continues in spite of that.

You said Iran’s goal is to develop nuclear weapons, and as prime minister, you will never gamble with the security of Israel. It sounds like war is inevitable.

NETANYAHU: Oh, I don’t think so. I mean, we’ve seen, in fact, that Iran backed off from its nuclear program, its nuclear weapons program, really only once in the 15, 16 years that I’ve been warning the world about the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran. And the only time they backed away was in 2003, when they thought there’d be a credible military threat against them.

So in fact, the paradox is that if they actually believe that they’re going to face the military option, you probably won’t need the military option.

VAN SUSTEREN: And I guess that’s why — I suppose that Secretary of Defense Panetta’s statements that military options are on the table and President Obama’s statement, as well, is helpful to discourage Iran.

NETANYAHU: I think these are important statements. I think that the idea that containment vis-a-vis a nuclear Iran is not an option are important statements. Just remember what it means. You try to contain a regime that is fostering terror worldwide, that could use nuclear terror here at any city, any port. That’s a very dubious proposition.

So I think all these things are important, as was the president’s statement of something that is very true about the ethos of what Israel is all about, that Israel, as a sovereign country, must have the ability to defend itself by itself against any threat. And as a sovereign country, we have the right to decide to act in our own defense.

VAN SUSTEREN: Is there anyone that disputes that, though, that Israel doesn’t have a right to defend itself, doesn’t have a right to its sovereignty? I mean, obviously, the sovereignty (INAUDIBLE) but the right to defend yourself.

NETANYAHU: Well, you know, it’s a question of the assessment of when have you to activate that right. I think that’s the real important thing. I think the reiteration of that basic proposition was important. I think it — you can’t repeat that too often.

VAN SUSTEREN: I guess that means a little bit in terms of preemptive, whether you preempt Iran taking nuclear action, building a bomb, is whether you go in there ahead of time? Is that what you mean?

NETANYAHU: Well, I mean that — I mean that the Jewish people were faced often in our history with a situation that people try to destroy us. In fact, they did destroy millions of Jews in the last century. And we could do nothing about it because we had no sovereign state.

Now they still try. They still threaten to destroy us, but this time, there’s a state of Israel, and if necessary, we’ll act in our own defense. And I think it’s very important to repeat that clearly. And obviously, this is something that is perhaps the most — the primary — the supreme responsibility that I, as the prime minister of Israel, have, to — to guarantee that the future of the Jewish state, the Jewish future, is secure.

VAN SUSTEREN: You talk about the Jewish future, but you also touched on last night that if Iran gets a nuclear weapon, obviously you are in the direct line of fire and Ahmadinejad has made very derogatory marks and stated his very ugly intentions towards Israel.

NETANYAHU: Now you are being a diplomat. He said that Israel should be wiped off the face of the earth and they are developing nuclear weapons to do it, for that purpose. Not only for that. They could shut down the Straits of Hormuz. They are threatening that. You are worried about the price of oil today. Think about what it would mean if Iran, this radical regime that chants “Death to America! Death to Israel!” A, they get their hands on atomic bombs. They could use it against any one of us, b, they could give it to their terrorist proxies to use against any one of us, three, they could threaten credibly to block the Straits of Hormuz, which would send the price of oil skyrocketing, not anything that even remotely resembles what we have now, and they will pocket the dough because they are oil producers.

So these are things that could change the world. It could be like a hinge of history. We could live in another time. We have never had since the advent of nuclear weapons a regime that could act with such irresponsibility having those weapons of mass death.

So I think this is something that we should — we should talk about. Everybody talks about the — you know, the costs of taking action, to stop Iran. I think it’s important to start on the cost of not acting to stop Iran, of a world in which the ayatollahs would have atomic bombs. I think that would be catastrophic.

VAN SUSTEREN: Do you have a sense that other nations have that sense of seriousness that you have about this issue? Or do you think many nations think we can talk our out of this a little bit?

NETANYAHU: I think they would like it see Iran agree to the dismantling nuclear program. I think they are trying to press them to do that. The pressures have been applied. They have intensified. The economic sanctions hurt Iran, economically, no question about that. But so far, it hasn’t — these sanctions haven’t achieved the one goal they have, which is to make Iran stop their nuclear weapons program.

VAN SUSTEREN: Do you have any doubt they have a nuclear weapons program?

NETANYAHU: God, I said yesterday, what do you think Iran is doing all of this — developing these underground halls with thousands of centrifuges to enrich uranium, underground nuclear facility. They’re building ICBM, intercontinental ballistic missiles, to carry, what? Medical isotopes? That’s their explanation? They are absorbing these crippling sanctions. And I said yesterday, what are they doing it for? I said yesterday, if it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck — it’s a duck. It’s a nuclear duck.

So I don’t think anyone seriously thinks that Iran is doing all of this, going through all of this huge investment, taking huge risks for anything but a nuclear program, and I think we should recognize that.

And the second thing we should recognize is that so far we have not been able to stop their nuclear program, notwithstanding the tough sanctions that have been applied. They are still going away. And, by the way, that’s not what I am saying. That’s what the International Atomic Energy Agency, the IAEA, just said yesterday. They published a report and said that Iran is continuing and in fact accelerating its program. For god’s sakes, Ahmadinejad is taking people on guided tours of these facilities. People, the international inspectors are actually saying there is material near low enriched uranium for five bombs and they are enriching uranium now at a higher level to give them their nuclear weapons. I think there is no question.

VAN SUSTEREN: I guess I asked because is one of the things that the more we talk and have diplomacy, there is more of a chance to build more, develop more. So diplomacy does have its drawback that way, spending a lot of time talking if they don’t stop the program.

And the other problem too is in 2003, with weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, there was so much certainty and it turned out, our intelligence was wrong on that. So I am trying to balance the two.

NETANYAHU: First of all, there is no question. There is no comparison. In the case of Iraq, I was on the Israeli cabinet when we discussed this issue. We didn’t know. We couldn’t say that they didn’t have a nuclear weapons program, we couldn’t say if they did. In the case of Iran there is absolutely no question. We share all of that information. We know the stockpiling of enriched uranium. We know the development of ICBMs. We know a lot more. And we share this information. I don’t think that’s comparable to –

VAN SUSTEREN: What’s the timeline? How much time do we have?

NETANYAHU: Every day that passes makes it closer and closer.

VAN SUSTEREN: Is it weeks, months, or years?

Israel Political Brief March 7, 2012: Israel cautiously welcomes Western nuclear talks with Iran

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF

ISRAEL POLITICAL BRIEF: ISRAEL NEWS

Israel cautiously welcomes Western nuclear talks with Iran

National Security Adviser Yaakov Amidror: There will be no one happier than Israel if Iran gives up its military nuclear capability through talks.

Source: Haaretz, 3-7-12

Israel on Wednesday cautiously welcomed the planned resumption of big-power nuclear talks with Iran, insisting that Tehran be denied the means to turn uranium into bomb fuel.

With Israel speaking increasingly loudly of resorting to military action to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons, the talks could provide some respite in a crisis that has driven up oil prices and threatened to draw the United States into its third major war in a decade.

Benjamin Netanyahu March 7, 2012 (GPO) Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Ben-Gurion Airport after returning from North America trip, March 7, 2012.
Photo by: Amos Ben Gershom / GPO

Tuesday’s announcement of new talks followed a visit by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the United States, where President Barack Obama said the talks offered a diplomatic chance to quiet the “drums of war”.

“I’m very happy that they are opening discussions,” said Netanyahu’s national security adviser, Yaakov Amidror.

“There will be no one happier than us, and the prime minister said this in his own voice, if it emerges that in these talks Iran will give up on its military nuclear capability,” he told Israel Radio….READ MORE

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: